“War Horse” marks Steven Spielberg’s return to the war genre since
“Saving Private Ryan.” The veteran director slathers his latest project with
his distinctive and entertaining style, but the film is ultimately shortchanged
by its sentimentality.
Jeremy Irvine plays Albert in "War Horse." Courtesy DreamWorks Studios |
Spielberg
begins “War Horse” with grandiose shots of Devon, a picturesque English
countryside with luscious, green hills and a charming town, in the year 1914. Here
a young boy, Albert, peers through a fence and witnesses the birth of a thoroughbred
foal. Albert eagerly attempts to befriend the horse as they both grow up, but
eventually the horse is taken away to be sold at auction. As the horse gallops
into the auction corral, Albert’s father, despite needing a work horse, is
astounded by its majesty and impulsively purchases the animal.
As
his family is on the verge of bankruptcy and without a suitable work horse,
Albert promises his distraught mother and remorseful father to train the horse,
who he names Joey, to plow the family’s farm. Albert and Joey form a bond, and,
against all odds, Joey eventually plows the field and saves the farm.
After
a leisurely half-hour of exposition, war is declared, and Albert’s father sells
Joey to a British officer, Captain Nicholls, to finance more of his debts.
Teary-eyed, Albert pleads with his father and Nicholls to keep Joey in Devon. His
pleas are futile, but the officer promises to take special care of Joey.
After this incident “War Horse” charts a different narrative course. For the remainder of the film
Joey falls in the hands of multiple owners amidst the savagery of World War I,
and each owner serves as a sort of episode within the movie. With each new owner
the film depicts a different perspective of the War, including those of Germans,
Britons, and a French girl. Some of these episodes are more refined and
poignant than others, but all of them are very short. Indeed, the audience can
expect that Joey stays with one owner for only a matter of minutes before
finding itself with a new one. Due to their brevity, the episodes feel underdeveloped,
and this ultimately hampers the film’s thematic impact.
“War Horse” does not primarily focus on the thematic
elements of war; rather, the film concerns itself with themes of hope and
friendship. Spielberg, famous for his not-so-subtle sentimentality in many of
his films, does not hold back here. The film is crafted to be a feel-good
tear-jerker, but its sentimentality is slightly overshadowed by the horrifying
nature of war. It’s difficult to care about a horse (as one critic put it: anthropomorphism
can only go so far) while men cut each other down with machine guns and artillery
shells blast them to pieces. Of course, some audience members may have to
break out the tissues while watching the film, but for others the
sentimentalism in “War Horse” may seem slightly misplaced.
There are some redeeming elements in the film. In the hands of lesser directors
this movie could have been a disaster, but Spielberg manages to apply his unique
and entertaining style and make “War Horse” a decent film. The film boasts
captivating visuals as well as a superb orchestral score from John Williams. There
are a few set pieces – particularly the battle sequences – that are fairly
impressive and commensurable to those in “Saving Private Ryan.”
In the end, however, “War
Horse” proves to be an adequate film, but one that is unremarkable.
Did you enjoy this review? Check out more reviews by Derek here.
Tweet
2 comments:
I've wanted to see this. I think it looks good but whenever I would see a preview I always thought it looked a little cheesy. Especially the fact that this horse seemed to be the most important thing going on in the movie even though there is a massive war going on! I will probably still watch it at some point.
I like what you had to say about it though Derek.
Thanks Mike! Let me know what you think of it when you watch it!
Post a Comment